Steve Tetreault /386 words23 April 2010/The Las Vegas Review-Journal/LVGS/2B/English/© 2010 The Las Vegas Review-Journal. Provided by ProQuest Information and Learning. All Rights Reserved. By STEVE TETREAULT/ STEPHENS WASHINGTON BUREAU
WASHINGTON - The Senate took an initial step Thursday to end funding for the Yucca Mountain Project when its budget committee approved a 2011 blueprint that senators said contains no room for the nuclear waste repository plan.
The budget plan put together by Chairman Sen. Kent Conrad, D- N.D., "supports the president's request to close the Yucca Mountain nuclear repository and establish a blue ribbon commission to investigate alternatives," according to a Senate Budget Committee document.
The budget resolution is an early but not surprising sign that senior senators under the direction of Majority Leader Harry Reid, D- Nev., do not want to continue spending for the Yucca Mountain Project. President Barack Obama has declared he wants to end the underground waste storage program, and a blue ribbon study panel began work last month on searching for other strategies.
Although the Obama administration plan is being challenged through several lawsuits, Reid said Thursday the Senate budget "makes very clear that taxpayer dollars will no longer be wasted on Yucca Mountain and without funding the project is dead."
Sen. John Ensign, R-Nev., who sits on the budget committee, said the panel "affirmed President Obama's decision to shut down Yucca Mountain and I look forward to the full Senate voting to do the same."
The budget resolution is a broad stroke overview of how Congress might prioritize its spending and taxing for the upcoming fiscal year that starts in October. It serves as a guideline for appropriations subcommittees to write follow-up spending bills over the summer.
Senators on the subcommittee that writes the Department of Energy spending bill could ignore the budget plan and set their own priorities. But if they added money for Yucca Mountain they would do so at the risk of crossing Reid, who has made the project's shutdown a signature career issue.
The Senate Budget Committee, by a 12-10 vote, approved a blueprint that calls for tighter limits on spending than what Obama has proposed. Ensign voted against it, according to his office, because it still contained too much "wasteful and out-of-control government spending."
Contact Stephens Washington Bureau Chief Steve Tetreault at stetreault@stephensmedia.com or202-783-1760.
CRESP Newstories and Links related to risk-based cleanup of the nation’s nuclear weapons production facility waste sites and cost-effective, risk-based management of potential future nuclear sites and wastes. CRESP seeks to improve the scientific and technical basis for environmental management decisions by the Department of Energy (DOE) and by fostering public participation in that search.
My Blog List
Friday, April 30, 2010
NRC sets deadline for Yucca Mountain decision
By Steve Tetreault, Las Vegas Review-Journal /McClatchy-Tribune Regional News/ 273 words/ 23 April 2010/ Las Vegas Review-Journal (MCT)/ KRTLVEnglish/ Distributed by McClatchy - Tribune Information Services
Apr. 23--WASHINGTON -- The leaders of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Friday set a June 1 deadline for decisions whether to allow for the termination of the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste site, a move that could speed the shutdown of the controversial project.
A panel of administrative judges within the NRC had wanted to delay ruling on whether the Department of Energy could withdraw the controversial Nevada project until a federal court could weigh legal challenges against DOE's efforts to shut it down.But in a 4-0 vote, the commissioners who head the nuclear safety agency ordered the judges to get back to work and issue a decision by June 1.The commissioners said the NRC shouldn't be sitting on the sidelines while courts take up an issue that is clearly within the agency's purview, and that federal judges might benefit from whatever decision the NRC reaches."We think a prudent course of action is to resolve the matters pending before our agency as expeditiously and responsibly as possible," the commissioners said in a five-page order.
NRC officials said the board's order could put the agency on an assured course to decide the fate of the nuclear waste project the Obama administration wants to bring to an end.
Apr. 23--WASHINGTON -- The leaders of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Friday set a June 1 deadline for decisions whether to allow for the termination of the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste site, a move that could speed the shutdown of the controversial project.
A panel of administrative judges within the NRC had wanted to delay ruling on whether the Department of Energy could withdraw the controversial Nevada project until a federal court could weigh legal challenges against DOE's efforts to shut it down.But in a 4-0 vote, the commissioners who head the nuclear safety agency ordered the judges to get back to work and issue a decision by June 1.The commissioners said the NRC shouldn't be sitting on the sidelines while courts take up an issue that is clearly within the agency's purview, and that federal judges might benefit from whatever decision the NRC reaches."We think a prudent course of action is to resolve the matters pending before our agency as expeditiously and responsibly as possible," the commissioners said in a five-page order.
NRC officials said the board's order could put the agency on an assured course to decide the fate of the nuclear waste project the Obama administration wants to bring to an end.
NUCLEAR WASTE; Obama admin says cleanup stimulus exceeds expectations
Mike Soraghan, E&E reporter / 335 words/ 22 April 2010/ Environment & Energy Daily/ ENEND/ English/
© 2010 E&E Publishing, LLC. All Rights Reserved
President Obama's stimulus plan has created more jobs than expected in the field of nuclear cleanup, an administration official testified yesterday.
The $6 billion in the stimulus plan for nuclear cleanup was projected to "create or save" 13,000 jobs. But the administration says it has exceeded that number by 3,000.
"We have been able to substantiate 16,000 workers," Inés Triay, DOE's assistant secretary for Environmental Management told the Strategic Forces Subcommittee of the Senate Armed Services Committee.
That number includes 9,200 direct jobs at contractors and subcontractors, and thousands more indirect jobs at vendor companies, such as those manufacturing the special shipping containers used to move nuclear waste, Triay said.
Subcommittee Chairman Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) said the stimulus cleanup program has fallen behind and $1.7 billion has been spent, though he cautioned against haste. "It is less important that this work be done quickly than correctly," Nelson said.
The government's effort to clean up Cold War legacy radioactive waste is often criticized for costly delays and missed deadlines. The $6 billion boost from the $787 billion economic stimulus bill was intended to speed up some cleanup efforts, including removing uranium mill tailings from a Moab, Utah, site and accelerating processing of transuranic wastes from 11 sites.
Though some projects have fallen years behind schedule, the Obama administration did not seek significant boosts for the Environmental Management program's fiscal 2011 budget.
The administration did target the Office of River Protection for a $60 million research and development program to help stabilize and dispose of radioactive liquid tank waste -- one of the most difficult cleanup challenges DOE faces and that, if fruitful, could help significantly decrease timelines for several cleanup sites. The office's goal is ultimately to reduce the legacy footprint by 40 percent by the end of fiscal 2011 and up to 90 percent by fiscal 2015.
© 2010 E&E Publishing, LLC. All Rights Reserved
President Obama's stimulus plan has created more jobs than expected in the field of nuclear cleanup, an administration official testified yesterday.
The $6 billion in the stimulus plan for nuclear cleanup was projected to "create or save" 13,000 jobs. But the administration says it has exceeded that number by 3,000.
"We have been able to substantiate 16,000 workers," Inés Triay, DOE's assistant secretary for Environmental Management told the Strategic Forces Subcommittee of the Senate Armed Services Committee.
That number includes 9,200 direct jobs at contractors and subcontractors, and thousands more indirect jobs at vendor companies, such as those manufacturing the special shipping containers used to move nuclear waste, Triay said.
Subcommittee Chairman Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) said the stimulus cleanup program has fallen behind and $1.7 billion has been spent, though he cautioned against haste. "It is less important that this work be done quickly than correctly," Nelson said.
The government's effort to clean up Cold War legacy radioactive waste is often criticized for costly delays and missed deadlines. The $6 billion boost from the $787 billion economic stimulus bill was intended to speed up some cleanup efforts, including removing uranium mill tailings from a Moab, Utah, site and accelerating processing of transuranic wastes from 11 sites.
Though some projects have fallen years behind schedule, the Obama administration did not seek significant boosts for the Environmental Management program's fiscal 2011 budget.
The administration did target the Office of River Protection for a $60 million research and development program to help stabilize and dispose of radioactive liquid tank waste -- one of the most difficult cleanup challenges DOE faces and that, if fruitful, could help significantly decrease timelines for several cleanup sites. The office's goal is ultimately to reduce the legacy footprint by 40 percent by the end of fiscal 2011 and up to 90 percent by fiscal 2015.
REID STATEMENT ON ELIMINATION OF FUNDING FOR YUCCA MOUNTAIN
183 words/22 April 2010/ States News Service/ SNS/ English/ (c) 2010 States News Service
The following information was released by Nevada Senator Harry Reid:
– Nevada Senator Harry Reid today made the following statement on the release of the U.S. Senate Budget Committee Chairman's mark of the 2011 budget and the elimination of funding for Yucca Mountain.
“Chairman Conrad's mark of the 2011 budget reflects my shared commitment with President Obama to eliminate funding and bring the Yucca Mountain Project to its rightful end,” Reid said. “The anticipated challenges to the closure of this ill-conceived project neglect what this budget language makes very clear, that taxpayer dollars will no longer be wasted on Yucca Mountain and without funding the project is dead.”
Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad includes the following language in his mark of the 2011 budget.Ø Yucca Mountain
The Chairman's Mark supports the President's request to close the Yucca Mountain nuclear repository and establish a blue ribbon commission to investigate alternatives.
http://budget.senate.gov/democratic/documents/2010/Chairman%27s%20Mark_042110.pdf
04/22/10 13:00:05
The following information was released by Nevada Senator Harry Reid:
– Nevada Senator Harry Reid today made the following statement on the release of the U.S. Senate Budget Committee Chairman's mark of the 2011 budget and the elimination of funding for Yucca Mountain.
“Chairman Conrad's mark of the 2011 budget reflects my shared commitment with President Obama to eliminate funding and bring the Yucca Mountain Project to its rightful end,” Reid said. “The anticipated challenges to the closure of this ill-conceived project neglect what this budget language makes very clear, that taxpayer dollars will no longer be wasted on Yucca Mountain and without funding the project is dead.”
Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad includes the following language in his mark of the 2011 budget.Ø Yucca Mountain
The Chairman's Mark supports the President's request to close the Yucca Mountain nuclear repository and establish a blue ribbon commission to investigate alternatives.
http://budget.senate.gov/democratic/documents/2010/Chairman%27s%20Mark_042110.pdf
04/22/10 13:00:05
New Hanford radiation cleanup deadlines proposed
ANNETTE CARY / 797 words/22 April 2010/08:33Associated Press Newswires/APRS/English/(c) 2010. The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.
TRI-CITIES, Wash. (AP) - The Department of Energy and its regulators have agreed to new legally binding environmental cleanup deadlines for radioactive waste that has been temporarily buried at central Hanford since 1970.
The proposed new package of deadlines would allow more time for some work but also add new deadlines DOE must meet. They include the first-ever deadlines for when some of the waste must be shipped to a national repository in New Mexico and a final cleanup deadline for some of the most difficult-to-handle solid waste, which Hanford now lacks the capabilities to prepare for disposal.
"We've come up with a change package that satisfies the interest of DOE, Ecology and the public," said Deborah Singleton, project manager for the Washington State Department of Ecology. The state and the Environmental Protection Agency are Hanford regulators.
TRI-CITIES, Wash. (AP) - The Department of Energy and its regulators have agreed to new legally binding environmental cleanup deadlines for radioactive waste that has been temporarily buried at central Hanford since 1970.
The proposed new package of deadlines would allow more time for some work but also add new deadlines DOE must meet. They include the first-ever deadlines for when some of the waste must be shipped to a national repository in New Mexico and a final cleanup deadline for some of the most difficult-to-handle solid waste, which Hanford now lacks the capabilities to prepare for disposal.
"We've come up with a change package that satisfies the interest of DOE, Ecology and the public," said Deborah Singleton, project manager for the Washington State Department of Ecology. The state and the Environmental Protection Agency are Hanford regulators.
CAMPAIGN 2010: Reid banking on Yucca's death to help win over skeptical electorate (04/30/2010)
Alex Kaplun, E&E reporter
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has spent much of his congressional career battling the construction of the Yucca Mountain nuclear repository.
Now, the Democratic leader is banking on that advocacy to pay off politically and help sway an electorate that at the moment appears unwilling to give him another term on Capitol Hill.
Faced with a tough re-election fight, Reid has again and again pointed to the slow death of the Yucca facility as a sign of his power in Washington and his ability to deliver for Nevada.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has spent much of his congressional career battling the construction of the Yucca Mountain nuclear repository.
Now, the Democratic leader is banking on that advocacy to pay off politically and help sway an electorate that at the moment appears unwilling to give him another term on Capitol Hill.
Faced with a tough re-election fight, Reid has again and again pointed to the slow death of the Yucca facility as a sign of his power in Washington and his ability to deliver for Nevada.
SCIENCE: House panel approves $84B research, innovation bill (04/29/2010)
Katie Howell, E&E reporter
The House Science and Technology Committee last night approved, 29-8, an $84 billion research and education bill that reauthorizes an innovative energy technology research program at the Energy Department.
The committee approved the bill (H.R. 5116) with a substitute amendment that would keep key science agencies on a path to doubling their budgets from 2007 appropriated levels after hours of debate on nearly 60 amendments.
"Honestly, this bill is a big deal and is important," said Chairman Bart Gordon (D-Tenn.). "It's a big deal and important for our country and for this committee's stature in the Congress. It's a big deal and an important step in leading our innovation agenda."
The House Science and Technology Committee last night approved, 29-8, an $84 billion research and education bill that reauthorizes an innovative energy technology research program at the Energy Department.
The committee approved the bill (H.R. 5116) with a substitute amendment that would keep key science agencies on a path to doubling their budgets from 2007 appropriated levels after hours of debate on nearly 60 amendments.
"Honestly, this bill is a big deal and is important," said Chairman Bart Gordon (D-Tenn.). "It's a big deal and important for our country and for this committee's stature in the Congress. It's a big deal and an important step in leading our innovation agenda."
Letter: Recycling plutonium is an insane policyfrom Nuclear waste Environment guardian.co.uk
Your dispatch (Pakistan arsenal in spotlight at US nuclear summit as report warns of terrorist threat, 13 April) says "the summit will endorse Obama's goal of locking up the world's stockpile of plutonium or HEU [highly enriched uranium] within four years". Later it records that "as a contribution to the aims of the summit, the US and Russia are due to sign an agreement … to take 34 tonnes of weapons-grade plutonium out of their reserve stockpiles and use it for the generation of nuclear power." The problem is that these two aims are in direct contradiction!
The recycling of plutonium is the most dangerous counter-terrorism and non-proliferation policy imaginable. It will normalise the use of the prime nuclear explosive material in international commerce, and ensure the movement from secured nuclear sites of huge quantities of weapons-usable nuclear material on roads, highways and public railways, placing it into the most vulnerable locations and inviting terrorist interventions.
At the nuclear summit, David Miliband fronted his brother Ed's policy in the Labour manifesto he authored. The manifesto claims: "We have created Britain's first ever National Security Strategy to strengthen our response to fast-moving and interconnected threats, from terrorism and nuclear proliferation … We will fight for multilateral disarmament, working for a world free of nuclear weapons, in the Non Proliferation Treaty Review conference and beyond – combining support for civilian nuclear energy with concerted action against proliferation."
This policy is insane, hugely increasing global insecurity. It is out of the nuclear frying pan, into the atomic fire!
Dr David LowryFormer director, European Proliferation Information Centre
The recycling of plutonium is the most dangerous counter-terrorism and non-proliferation policy imaginable. It will normalise the use of the prime nuclear explosive material in international commerce, and ensure the movement from secured nuclear sites of huge quantities of weapons-usable nuclear material on roads, highways and public railways, placing it into the most vulnerable locations and inviting terrorist interventions.
At the nuclear summit, David Miliband fronted his brother Ed's policy in the Labour manifesto he authored. The manifesto claims: "We have created Britain's first ever National Security Strategy to strengthen our response to fast-moving and interconnected threats, from terrorism and nuclear proliferation … We will fight for multilateral disarmament, working for a world free of nuclear weapons, in the Non Proliferation Treaty Review conference and beyond – combining support for civilian nuclear energy with concerted action against proliferation."
This policy is insane, hugely increasing global insecurity. It is out of the nuclear frying pan, into the atomic fire!
Dr David LowryFormer director, European Proliferation Information Centre
Completion of 300 Area Waste Sites Meets TPA Milestone
RICHLAND, Wash. – The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) met a Tri-Party Agreement (TPA) milestone by completing cleanup work on 11 different waste sites at Hanford’s 300 Area just north of Richland, Wash.
Work on the waste sites began in 2002 and was completed in April by DOE’s River Corridor contractor, Washington Closure Hanford.
During that time, 426,000 tons of soil and debris were removed from the waste sites, with the most significant volumes coming from a waste site called the 618-7 Burial Ground. Volumes of waste in the group of waste sites ranged in size from 10 tons to 178,000 tons removed.
The TPA milestone required that cleanup work be completed before December 31, 2012 at these waste sites: 300-8, 300-18, 300-VTS, 600-47, 600-259, 618-2, 618-3, 618-5, 618-7, 618-8, and 618-13.
Of the 11 waste sites, six were surface sites with smaller volumes of waste, while five of the burial grounds had larger volumes and more significant hazards. One of the most hazardous and challenging burial grounds was 618-7, which held more than 800 barrels of hazardous materials, twenty large contaminated stainless steel tanks, 100 drums of zircaloy chips and extensive amounts of soil and debris containing lead contamination.
DOE’s former contractor, Bechtel Hanford Inc., began work on all but a few of the sites. The cleanup work was later transferred to Washington Closure Hanford when DOE selected the company to lead the River Corridor Closure Project in 2005.
“What we learned from the hazards of the early waste sites gave us a tremendous leg up on the tougher burial grounds,” said Dave Brockman, Manager of the Richland Operations Office. “Our contractors gained a great deal of knowledge about how to safely and efficiently work these hazardous burial grounds.”
John Darby, a project manager for Washington Closure who worked on several of the sites said that work at the 618-2 Burial Ground, “fundamentally changed the way we clean up waste sites at Hanford – from how we protect people to how we manage the site and unknown items we discover along the way. It totally changed our approach to remediation,” said Darby.
With the completion of the burial grounds, most of which were outside the 300 Area perimeter fence, work has shifted to waste sites inside the fence. Most of the remaining sites are associated with buildings that must be removed in order to reach the waste sites underneath.
Work on the waste sites began in 2002 and was completed in April by DOE’s River Corridor contractor, Washington Closure Hanford.
During that time, 426,000 tons of soil and debris were removed from the waste sites, with the most significant volumes coming from a waste site called the 618-7 Burial Ground. Volumes of waste in the group of waste sites ranged in size from 10 tons to 178,000 tons removed.
The TPA milestone required that cleanup work be completed before December 31, 2012 at these waste sites: 300-8, 300-18, 300-VTS, 600-47, 600-259, 618-2, 618-3, 618-5, 618-7, 618-8, and 618-13.
Of the 11 waste sites, six were surface sites with smaller volumes of waste, while five of the burial grounds had larger volumes and more significant hazards. One of the most hazardous and challenging burial grounds was 618-7, which held more than 800 barrels of hazardous materials, twenty large contaminated stainless steel tanks, 100 drums of zircaloy chips and extensive amounts of soil and debris containing lead contamination.
DOE’s former contractor, Bechtel Hanford Inc., began work on all but a few of the sites. The cleanup work was later transferred to Washington Closure Hanford when DOE selected the company to lead the River Corridor Closure Project in 2005.
“What we learned from the hazards of the early waste sites gave us a tremendous leg up on the tougher burial grounds,” said Dave Brockman, Manager of the Richland Operations Office. “Our contractors gained a great deal of knowledge about how to safely and efficiently work these hazardous burial grounds.”
John Darby, a project manager for Washington Closure who worked on several of the sites said that work at the 618-2 Burial Ground, “fundamentally changed the way we clean up waste sites at Hanford – from how we protect people to how we manage the site and unknown items we discover along the way. It totally changed our approach to remediation,” said Darby.
With the completion of the burial grounds, most of which were outside the 300 Area perimeter fence, work has shifted to waste sites inside the fence. Most of the remaining sites are associated with buildings that must be removed in order to reach the waste sites underneath.
DOE Awards Small Business Contract for Environmental Remediation Project at the Paducah Site
Lexington, KY– The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today awarded a small-business contract to LATA Environmental Services of Kentucky, LLC, of Westerville, Ohio. The cost-plus-awardfee contract is estimated at approximately $285 million and will continue the environmental remediation project at the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant in Paducah, Kentucky. The contract was awarded based on the best value to DOE. Under this contract, LATA Environmental Services of Kentucky, LLC will be responsible for
completing the following remediation activities:
Groundwater removal and treatment
Containment of the site’s burial ground materials and inactive facilities disposition
Surface soil removal, treatment, and containment
Surface water treatment and sediment removal
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) disposal
Environmental monitoring and reporting
Waste disposal and project support
completing the following remediation activities:
Groundwater removal and treatment
Containment of the site’s burial ground materials and inactive facilities disposition
Surface soil removal, treatment, and containment
Surface water treatment and sediment removal
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) disposal
Environmental monitoring and reporting
Waste disposal and project support
WIPP Trucks Surpass 10 Million Loaded Miles
CARLSBAD, N.M., April 19, 2010 – The U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Carlsbad Field Office said drivers, who haul defense-related transuranic (TRU) waste to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, surpassed 10 million safe, loaded miles. The first of more than 8,400 shipments to WIPP arrived 11 years ago from Los Alamos National Laboratory in northern New Mexico.
“There’s no doubt, some of the best drivers in the transportation industry work for WIPP,”said Dr. Dave Moody, Carlsbad Field Office manager. Loaded miles, he explained, are the number of miles traveled hauling a waste payload. The milestone shipment contained contact-handled TRU waste that originated from the Hanford Site in Washington State.
“If you consider round-trips, our trucks have traveled 20 million miles on the nation’s highways without a serious injury or release of radioactive material. I am extremely proud of the WIPP transportation system and all of those dedicated to ensuring the safety of our shipments,” added Moody. Two transportation carriers, CAST Specialty Transportation of Henderson, Colo. and Visionary Solutions LLC out of Oak Ridge, Tenn. contract to DOE to haul waste for WIPP. WIPP
“There’s no doubt, some of the best drivers in the transportation industry work for WIPP,”said Dr. Dave Moody, Carlsbad Field Office manager. Loaded miles, he explained, are the number of miles traveled hauling a waste payload. The milestone shipment contained contact-handled TRU waste that originated from the Hanford Site in Washington State.
“If you consider round-trips, our trucks have traveled 20 million miles on the nation’s highways without a serious injury or release of radioactive material. I am extremely proud of the WIPP transportation system and all of those dedicated to ensuring the safety of our shipments,” added Moody. Two transportation carriers, CAST Specialty Transportation of Henderson, Colo. and Visionary Solutions LLC out of Oak Ridge, Tenn. contract to DOE to haul waste for WIPP. WIPP
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
Hanford Cleanup: The First 20 Years
This report was written and produced by the Oregon Department of Energy’s Nuclear Safety Division,
with the support of U.S. Department of Energy Grant #DE-FG06-RL14780.
http://www.oregon.gov/ENERGY/NUCSAF/docs/HanfordFirst20years.pdf
with the support of U.S. Department of Energy Grant #DE-FG06-RL14780.
http://www.oregon.gov/ENERGY/NUCSAF/docs/HanfordFirst20years.pdf
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
NRC HISTORIAN RECEIVES PRESTIGIOUS AWARD FOR YUCCA MOUNTAIN BOOK
J. Samuel Walker, an NRC historian for more than 30 years, has been awarded the Richard W. Leopold Prize for his book “Yucca Mountain: The Development of Radioactive Waste Policy in the U.S.” The prize is given every two years by the Organization of American Historians (OAH) for the best book written by a government historian. In the book, published by University of California Press, Walker traces the U.S. government’s efforts to deal with radioactive waste from the Manhattan Project through the 1987 designation of Yucca Mountain as a high-level waste repository. According to the OAH, the book is “solidly researched and effectively written” and makes “an original and insightful contribution to understanding this important story.” The OAH also noted the book includes “perspectives beyond the government, especially interest groups and protest movements.”
DOE EM Testimonials (1)
DOE EM Testimonials (1)Assistant Secretary Triay's Written Statement before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development (March 16, 2010)from DOE EM Testimonials by DOE Environmental Management
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)